MichaelT.Sound, ideas
& everyday craft

Work

Read a pump proposal with flow and head in the right units

Clarify the quoted duty point and conditions before comparing a flow number with a model name.

MichaelT editorial23 October 2026

Identify the stated duty

Record the application question, fluid information supplied to the competent designer and the proposed pump reference. Keep the intended operating conditions with the document version. A catalogue photograph or maximum flow headline does not establish suitability. This page does not select materials, design piping, calculate a safe system or give installation instructions.

Keep Q and H separate

Grundfos describes the duty point as the intersection of the pump Q-H curve and the system characteristic. Flow Q and head H are different quantities. Ask for the actual units and the conditions represented by each quoted point. A maximum flow and a maximum head listed separately are not necessarily a single operating point that the pump can deliver simultaneously.

Convert only what is actually comparable

Convert flow units explicitly when needed: 60 litres per minute equals 3,600 litres per hour, or 3.6 cubic metres per hour. Keep the same time basis and quantity. This conversion does not turn head into pressure without the relevant physical conditions or account for losses in the actual system. Do not infer a motor rating or a compatible fluid from the arithmetic.

Ask the designer to close the gap

Compare the proposal with the actual duty and ask a competent professional about the pump curve, system conditions and unresolved assumptions. Retain their response and the referenced revision. If conditions change, ask whether the selection still applies. A properly converted number supports a precise enquiry; it does not certify performance or replace commissioning evidence.

Convert the flow, preserve the unknown: The flow conversion is exact for the stated units. It supplies no missing head, system curve or component selection.
Original MichaelT explanatory drawing. The flow conversion is exact for the stated units. It supplies no missing head, system curve or component selection. Open full-size drawing ↗
Read the drawing as text

The flow conversion is exact for the stated units. It supplies no missing head, system curve or component selection.

Work through an example

A fictional enquiry states 60 L/min, while the proposal uses 3.6 m³/h. The reviewer shows the unit conversion and confirms that these flow amounts are equivalent. The head and system-condition fields remain unanswered, so no suitable duty point or pump selection is established.

Illustrative example; figures, people and organisations in the worked record are fictional.

The example record

  • Requested flow

    Example
    60 L/min
    Conclusion
    Same as 3.6 m³/h
  • Conversion

    Example
    60 × 60 / 1,000
    Conclusion
    3.6 m³/h
  • Head H

    Example
    Not supplied
    Conclusion
    Duty incomplete
  • Selection

    Example
    Competent review needed
    Conclusion
    No performance approval

Download blank worksheet (.csv) ↗Download worked example (.csv) ↗

Keep your own record

Use the result within its scope

Use the actual manufacturer documentation and competent engineering assessment. Unit conversion is not a pump-sizing method.

Reference sources

Earlier articles on this subject

Continue with a related task

MICHAELT · SOUND, IDEAS & EVERYDAY CRAFT