MichaelT.Sound, ideas
& everyday craft

Everyday

Prepare a first family-mediation enquiry without assuming suitability

Organise the questions you want help discussing, then let the appropriate mediator assess the process and its suitability.

MichaelT editorial24 October 2026

State the purpose privately

Write the questions you hope to discuss in neutral language, separating agreed facts from disputed points and preferences. Keep children’s identities, financial documents and allegations out of public templates. An agenda can help explain the enquiry; it does not decide who is right, resolve legal rights or establish what agreement should be reached. Use appropriate professional support for your situation.

Ask about suitability first

GOV.UK describes an initial mediation information and assessment meeting in the England-and-Wales family context, with exceptions in some circumstances. Do not turn that into a worldwide requirement or an instruction to meet an ex-partner together. Tell the professional privately about safety, accessibility or communication concerns and ask which process is appropriate. A generic settlement article cannot make that assessment.

Clarify the actual process

Ask about the mediator’s role, professional status, individual assessment, format, costs, information handling and the next administrative step. Keep a request for information distinct from agreement to participate. Ask how any proposed outcome would be documented and when independent legal advice is needed. Do not assume a universal confidentiality rule, guaranteed settlement rate or automatic legal effect for every discussion.

Record a safe next contact

Keep the professional’s actual answer and the question that remains open. Follow the relevant local support or urgent route when safety requires it rather than waiting to complete an agenda. If mediation is unsuitable, ask the appropriate qualified professional about alternatives. The downloadable example is a neutral enquiry record, not a separation agreement, court document or recommendation to proceed.

An agenda comes before a process decision: Agreed facts and disputed questions inform a private professional enquiry; suitability and the next route remain to be assessed.
Original MichaelT explanatory drawing. Agreed facts and disputed questions inform a private professional enquiry; suitability and the next route remain to be assessed. Open full-size drawing ↗
Read the drawing as text

Agreed facts and disputed questions inform a private professional enquiry; suitability and the next route remain to be assessed.

Work through an example

A fictional person lists question Q about an arrangement, identifies what is agreed and asks mediator M about an initial individual assessment. Suitability has not been assessed, so the record remains enquiry pending. No joint meeting is booked and no legal agreement is implied. The next step is M’s appropriate response to the private enquiry, not an assumed obligation to negotiate.

Illustrative example; figures, people and organisations in the worked record are fictional.

The example record

  • Question

    Evidence
    Q stated neutrally
    Next question
    What help is being requested?
  • Facts

    Evidence
    Agreed / disputed kept separate
    Next question
    No decision on rights
  • Process

    Evidence
    Initial assessment requested
    Next question
    Suitability unanswered
  • Next contact

    Evidence
    Appropriate professional route
    Next question
    Format and support to clarify

Download blank worksheet (.csv) ↗Download worked example (.csv) ↗

Keep your own record

Use the result within its scope

Use current local rules and individual professional advice. A prepared agenda does not establish that mediation is suitable, safe or mandatory, and it does not guarantee agreement or replace legal advice.

Reference sources

Earlier articles on this subject

Continue with a related task

MICHAELT · SOUND, IDEAS & EVERYDAY CRAFT